Home News Weather Finance Travel Maps Movies Lottery Horoscopes Games
 SECTION: PARTY POLITICS & ELECTIONEERING
Search The Web:
DOMAIN NAMES
AS LOW AS $2.99 / YR.
Reactions Mixed To Campaign Finance Ruling
Thursday, 21-Jan-2010 1:44PM United Press International
USTINET NEWS

 » Front Page

 » Top Stories

 » U.S.

 » World

 » Politics

 » Business

 » Sports

 » Health

 » Tech/Science

 » Living/Entertainment

 » Off Beat Stories

 » News Photos

 » Weather


Special Editions

 » Iraq & Conflict

 » Israel/Palestine

 » Crimes & Laws


MultiMedia

 » Interactive Features

 » News Photos


POLL: Your Opinion

 » What Do You Think




WASHINGTON, Jan. 21 (UPI) -- Reactions were mixed Thursday to the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling that struck down restrictions on corporate and union political campaign donations.

SAVE MONEY ON TRAVEL DEALS

A conservative non-profit called Citizens United brought the case to the Supreme Court after the lower courts said its documentary, "Hillary: The Movie", was subject to federal restrictions and disclosure laws.

David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United, called the ruling a "tremendous victory."

"Today's U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing Citizens United to air its documentary films and advertisements is a tremendous victory, not only for Citizens United but for every American who desires to participate in the political process", he said in a statement.

Others saw the ruling as a defeat for the public.

Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, said it was time to "shed a tear for democracy."

"Today, in the case Citizens United v. FEC, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence election outcomes", Weissman said. "Money from Exxon, Goldman Sachs, Pfizer and the rest of the Fortune 500 is already corroding the policy making process in Washington, state capitals and city halls. Today, the Supreme Court tells these corporate giants that they have a constitutional right to trample our democracy.

"In eviscerating longstanding rules prohibiting corporations from using their own monies to influence elections", he added, "the court invites giant corporations to open up their treasuries to buy election outcomes. Corporations are sure to accept the invitation."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Related News Topics:

Top news from around the world
Party politics and electioneering
World politics
Party politics and electioneering

 BREAKING STORIES

Lawmaker calls for end to death penalty

More states trying to limit federal power

Sri Lanka general refutes charges

Italy's Berlusconi under another probe

Tea Party wins appeal on Menendez recall

DNC getting cash minus big donors

Opposition parties pick up Russian seats

Iraqi leader denies assassination attempt

Canada formalizes federal emergency plan

Turkish PM calls for unity with gypsies

Sarkozy's party second in elections voting

EU begins assessing Greek recovery plan

Boehner: GOP could capture House in Nov.

Russians flock to polls for elections

Centrists to Obama: Don't campaign for us

Protesters gather for Bangkok rally

Nelson Mandela defended by archbishop

Immigration pushed back by other issues

Thai protesters seek new elections

Cuomo recuses himself from Paterson probe

Home News Weather Finance Travel Maps Movies Lottery Horoscopes Games
Home :: My Page :: My WebMail :: My Calendar :: My Portfolio :: Chat :: Help Center :: Sign In :: Sign Out

MY.USTI.NET PORTAL  -  © 1996 - 2004 USTINET CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Please see our Privacy Policy, Security Guarantee, Terms of Use for additional information.