WASHINGTON - British lawmaker George Galloway vehemently
rejected a Senate subcommittee's claim that Saddam Hussein awarded
him lucrative allocations under the U.N. oil-for-food program and
accused its chairman of maligning his good name.HOT TRAVEL DEALS
The subcommittee, chaired by Minnesota Republican Norm
Coleman, claimed that Galloway allegedly funneled allocations
through a fund he established in 1998 to help a 4-year-old Iraqi
girl suffering from leukemia and received allocations worth 20
million barrels from 2000 to 2003.
"I am not now nor have I ever been an oil trader and
neither has anyone on my behalf", Galloway testified Tuesday.
"I was an opponent of Saddam Hussein when British and American
governments and businessmen were selling him guns and gas."
Coleman later questioned Galloway's testimony. "If in
fact he lied to this committee, there will have to be
consequences", Coleman said at a news conference after the
hearing.
Asked whether Galloway violated his oath to tell the truth
before the committee, Coleman said: "I don't know. We'll have
to look over the record. I just don't think he was a credible
witness."
The daylong hearing was reviewing three major reports from
the subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and
Government Affairs, which studied in great detail how Saddam made
billions in illegal oil sales despite U.N. sanctions imposed in 1991
after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
Coleman said Galloway and others who received oil
allocations, including prominent Russian politician Vladimir
Zhirinovsky, then paid kickbacks to Saddam as part of the deal. He
claimed that Saddam received more than $300,000 in surcharges on
allocations involving Galloway.
"Senior Hussein regime officials informed the
subcommittee that the allocation holders - in this case, Galloway -
were ultimately responsible for the surcharge payment and therefore
would have known of the illegal, under-the-table payment", he
said.
Galloway rejected that and accused Coleman of never having
contacted him about the charges. He also defended his opposition to
the U.N. sanctions and the U.S.-led Iraq war.
"I gave my heart and soul to stop you from committing
the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq", Galloway
said. "And I told the world that the case for war was a pack of
lies."
The oil-for-food program, which ran from 1996-2003, was
designed to let Saddam's government sell oil in exchange for
humanitarian goods to help the Iraqi people cope with crippling U.N.
sanctions.
But Saddam peddled influence by awarding favored
politicians, journalists and others vouchers for oil that could then
be resold at a profit. He also smuggled oil to Turkey, Jordan and
Syria outside the program, often with the explicit approval of the
United States and the rest of the U.N. Security Council.
As well as pointing the finger at politicians from Britain,
France and Russia, committee investigators also argue that a
Texas-based oil company, Bayoil, was involved in Saddam's
oil-for-food schemes. U.N. Security Council members including the
United States often looked the other way, they said.
"On the one hand, the United States was at the U.N.
trying to stop Iraq from imposing illegal surcharges on oil-for-food
contacts", Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said at the start of the
hearing. "On the other hand, the U.S. ignored red flags that
some U.S. companies might be paying those same illegal
surcharges."
While many of the oil-for-food claims are not new, rarely
have the allegations been spelled out with so much detail or scope.
Coleman's investigators have interviewed former top Iraqi officials
and businessmen, who provided a behind-the-scenes look at how
Saddam's grand scheme worked.
Coleman's committee also alleges that former French Interior
Minister Charles Pasqua received allocations worth 11 million
barrels from 1999 to 2000.
Documents released Monday by the minority Democrats on
Coleman's subcommittee examined two issues: Bayoil's involvement in
oil-for-food and a single instance that saw Saddam's regime smuggle
more than 7 million barrels of oil out of the Iraqi port of Khor
al-Amaya, apparently with U.S. knowledge, in the weeks before the
invasion in 2003.
The report found that Bayoil imported some 200 million
barrels over two years starting in September 2000 and sold it to
U.S. oil companies. That was at a time when Saddam was trying to
tinker with the price of oil so that when he sold it, companies
could be compelled to pay him kickbacks.
The report claimed that Bayoil paid "directly or
indirectly" some $37 million in kickbacks to Saddam even at a
time that the United States and other members of the council had
realized what Saddam was doing and began ordering price hikes to
quash the kickbacks scheme.
Bayoil then sold the crude to U.S. companies, though there
is no evidence the companies knew about the kickbacks, the report
said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Associated Press reporter Nick Wadhams contributed to this
story from New York. From Ken: