SAVE MONEY ON TRAVEL DEALS

Insufficient recognition of disorder consuming Iraq and a failure to deploy substantial troops following the 2003 invasion have been pointed out by analysts, but the Army criticizes itself in the official history, CNN reported Monday.

Blunt statements by Army officials in the 720-page report, put together by the Combat Studies Institute at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., indicate the military had strong worries from the beginning of the conflict until Iraq's January 2005 elections.

Officials said there was uncertainty surrounding planners' predictions and choices made after U.S.-led coalition soldiers gained control in the country.

Past wars "should have indicated that many more troops would be needed for the post-Saddam era in Iraq", historians wrote.

"The coalition's inability to prevent looting, to secure Iraq's borders and to guard the vast number of munitions dumps in the early months after Saddam's overthrow are indicative of the shortage", the report said.

 BREAKING STORIES

Iraqi PM: British troops can leave

Slain Taliban leader was Pakistan officer

Violence in Iraq kills 13

U.S. news media reduces Iraq presence

Nine Afghan militants killed in clashes

Turkey pounds Kurdish positions in Iraq

Russia: Georgia cease-fire implemented

Turkish jets, artillery target Kurds

Afghan war cost causes Canada uproar

Freed militant to remain in England

Canada denies another U.S. deserter

Russian troops leave Georgian buffer zones

Sticky IEDs new Iraq assassination choice

Crisis in Afghanistan coming, report says

Military briefs politicians on terrorism

Army Reservist earns Silver Star

Report increases airstrike civilian toll

Mexico mayor's slaying seen as gang threat

Russia, Belarus to sign air defense pact

Olmert urges halt of Russia-Iran arms deal