SAVE MONEY ON TRAVEL DEALS

The majority opinion in Thursday's 5-4 decision overturning a Washington, D.C., handgun possession ban definitively said the right to bear arms was an individual right, but it wasn't absolute, a Chicago Tribune editorial said Friday.

While local governments and law enforcement agencies may be curtailed in how they can control firearms, they are not banned completely from protecting their citizens against guns, the Tribune said.

"The majority left room for state and local governments to restrict the carrying of concealed weapons in public, to prohibit weapons in 'sensitive places such as schools and government buildings,' and to regulate the sale of firearms", the editorial said. Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion also allows "dangerous and unusual weapons" to be prohibited, but didn't say which weapons were "dangerous."

While affirming individual rights, the ruling is damaging, the Tribune said, because "it takes a significant public policy issue out of the hands of citizens."

"Want to debate whether crime-staggered cities should prohibit the possession of handguns?", the editorial asked. "The Supreme Court has just said, 'forget about it.'"

 BREAKING STORIES

Astros' Backe arrested in wedding 'riot'

DEA: Ship stopped with $58M in cocaine

Police group: Rethink anti-terrorism money

California bans texting while driving

Myanmar journalist released from prison

State force-feeds Connecticut inmate

Euthanasia advocate avoids prison by death

Olmert lashes out at Jewish vigilantes

Palin: Monegan wasn't fired, he quit

Panel OKs Palin subpoenas

Grandparents say they believe Caylee alive

Inmate: Commissary snack was sickening

ICE stepping up Ohio deportations

Cities use lawsuits to fight gangs

Law protects hunters shooting near Dallas

Report: McCain ally may block Palin probe

Palin will not be subpoenaed in probe

Marion Jones Out of Prison

Houston man guilty in kickback scheme

Utah city suing parents for kids' actions